From the Vault: William Derr
This summary outlines a 2009 correspondence regarding the review of the Station Fire, between William A. Derr, and Forest Service personnel Randy Moore, James Hubbard and Chief Tom Tidwell.
Concerns Raised by Mr. Derr
Review Process: Mr. Derr expressed concerns that the Station Fire Review Team did not conduct a comprehensive investigation. Specifically, he argued that the team failed to interview all relevant witnesses, focusing only on supervisors rather than all personnel involved in early suppression efforts.
Evidence of Management Failures: Mr. Derr alleged that suppression actions during the fire’s initial stage were inadequate and did not meet standard practices. He pointed to a "burning island" within the containment perimeter that was not properly extinguished, leading to spot fires and the eventual escape of the fire. He also questioned the qualifications of the Incident Commander (IC).
Employee Protections: A central concern was the need for written assurances to protect employees from retaliation if they provided information to the Review Team. He noted a perceived hostile work environment on the Angeles National Forest.
Forest Service Response
Defense of the Review: James E. Hubbard, Deputy Chief for State and Private Forestry, asserted that the review was conducted in a thorough and professional manner.
Scope of Inquiry: Hubbard stated he did not intend to interview all 200+ involved individuals, believing that focusing on key personnel and the Incident Commander was sufficient to understand the situation. He maintained that the decisions made by the Incident Commanders were rational based on the information they had at the time.
Conclusion: The Forest Service determined that no additional inquiry into the initial attack phase of the Station Fire was necessary or would be beneficial.
